Family Dynamics and Violence in Genesis

In just nine days (if you began your journey on January 15th), we have covered an enormous amount of material. The Creation of the world, told twice (In chapter 1, and then again with chapters 2-3); the murder of Abel by his older brother Cain; the Flood, told twice (interwoven stories in chapters 7-8- note the discrepancies in which kinds of animals and how many were taken onto the Ark, as well as discrepancies in timing; did the flood last forty days or 150 days?); God’s covenant with Noah (in chapter 9); the tower of Babel in chapter 11 (another tale, like the Garden of Eden, of human hubris and its consequences); and the beginning narratives of the patriarchs and matriarchs, chapters 12-50.

If you’re a little breathless, count yourself among friends. It’s an overwhelmingly complex, beautiful, multi-layered and breathtaking story about the origins of humanity and our relationship to God (and the brand new experience of monotheism!). We are looking at the written down traditions of stories that used to be oral, shared around the campfire, passed down over generations, modified according to geography and local context, and eventually captured on the page (or the scroll, to be historically accurate). We are reading geopolitics as family systems theory, with individuals representing entire tribes or nations, and dysfunctional family dynamics standing in for international relations. Understanding some of these early stories as allegories of political intrigue might help to alleviate the tension of so much strange and unsavory behavior.

For instance, let’s linger for a moment withLot. We are introduced to Lot in chapter 11, toward the end of a genealogy that has led us to Abram (aka Abraham), the true patriarch ofIsrael. Lot is Abram’s nephew, son of his brotherHaran.Lotwill become, as the narrative develops, the ancestor of the Moabites and Ammonites. The stories of Lot’s bad behavior (he is less gracious to the angels in chapter 19 than his uncle Abraham in chapter 18; he offers his virgin daughters as replacement victims of potential gang rape; and eventually finds himself in a drunken stupor and becomes the object of sexual transgression by his own offspring), serve to cast aspersions on Israel’s cultural rivals while acknowledging a kinship between them.

But the stories of Abraham and Lot are not simply about proving the superiority of one nation over another. They are also lessons about hospitality (Abraham entertaining angels, unaware of their true identity 18:1-15); justice and righteousness (Abraham bargaining with God to spare the citizens of Sodom18:16-33); and covenant/promise (throughout).

As you keep reading, maybe it’s helpful to hold these ideas together. The stories ofLotare horrific, and there is no redeeming value in the details of sexual violence. At the same time, there is a message (sometimes interwoven, sometimes bracketing these difficult scenes) about the primacy of hospitality and justice in the community of God’s people, as their ancestor, Abraham, enacts.

What has your experience of these difficult passages been like?

What messages are you receiving in these early stories of Genesis?

Bibliography

While I do a quick first read of my assigned task directly from my email, I try, when possible, to follow up with a secondary read from The Harper Collins Study Bible. Another resource I have found helpful (thanks Erin!) is James Kugel’s book, How to Read the Bible; A Guide to Scripture, Then and Now. Who has time for all this reading? I certainly don’t. But I like to be surrounded by great resources when I do find myself with a few extra minutes at the beginning or ending of the day.

Posted in Bible Study, Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah, Theology | 1 Comment

begin at the beginning

As you begin to make your way through the familiar and unfamiliar stories of Genesis, I want to offer some background relating to the ‘genesis’, if you will, of the Bible, specifically, the first five books of the Bible, called the Torah (“teaching” in Hebrew) within Judaism, or the Five Books of Moses- Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Today’s passage comes from Robert Alter’s book, The Five Books of Moses, A Translation with Commentary. In fact, I may lean heavily on Alter’s work in these early weeks with the Old Testament. It describes, with brevity, the Documentary Hypothesis of Genesis’ composition. The hypothesis, which achieved great acclaim in the twentieth century, is a great place to start (though newer scholarship has begun to question some of its assumptions and conclusions):

Much of what I have to say in my commentary about the details of the narrative presupposes that Genesis is a coherent book, what we moderns would think of as a work of literature. But, as many readers may be aware, two centuries of biblical scholarship have generally assumed that Genesis- and indeed each of the Five Books of Moses as well as most other biblical texts- is not strictly speaking a book but rather an accretion of sundry traditions, shot through with disjunctions and contradictions, and accumulated in an uneven editorial process over several centuries. There are knotty issues of the dating and the evolution of the text that have been debated by generations of scholars… but I do think that the historical and textual criticism of the Bible is not so damaging to a literary reading of the text as is often assumed…

Let me just say a few words about the different strands that are detectable in Genesis, Exodus, and Numbers… Since well back into the nineteenth century, it has been the consensus of biblical scholarship that Genesis, together with two of the next three books of the Pentateuch [“five books” in Hebrew], is woven together from three distinct literary sources or “documents”- the Yahwistic document (designated J), the Elohistic document (E), and the Priestly document (P). Most scholars have concluded that J and E are considerably earlier than P, which could be as late as the sixth century B.C.E. (the period after the return from the Babylonian exile)…

One need not claim that Genesis is a unitary artwork, like, say, a novel by Henry James, in order to grant it integrity as a book.”

What I appreciate about Alter’s approach is his willingness to stand within the historical/critical tradition, while at the same time considering the text as having a cohesive integrity, “a unitary artwork.” To the best of my ability, I hope to mimic his approach as we proceed.

Have you seen evidence of the ‘woven strands’ in these first few chapters?

What are your initials reflections on reading Genesis?

Emotional responses?

Please share!

Posted in Bible Study, Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah, Theology | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

nuts and bolts…

 Getting started

Today is the day! Today is the day that we begin our shared undertaking. Today is the day that you take a quick trip to www.bibleinayear.org and sign-up. You have a few options to choose from as you set up your account.

When asked which of the programs you want begin, select ‘start to finish.’  I recommend that you use the Revised Standard Version of the Bible. The RSV is a scholar’s version, and it is very similar to its younger sibling, the NRSV, which we use in worship. Of course, this is only a suggestion; you may use whichever translation you find most meaningful. Plug-in your email and a password, and you will be ready to go.

If you are reading this after January 15th, don’t fret! Go ahead and sign-up anyway. The books are long, and we will be spending plenty of time in each location, getting to know the lay of the land, meeting the main players, absorbing the complicated social structures, tripping over the pronunciation of hundreds of names (in the ‘begat’ sections), struggling with the nuances of so many obscure rules. As time goes on, and life overtakes us, we will undoubtedly become separated from one another. The ambitious will get ahead; the procrastinators (me!) will struggle not to fall too far behind. Hopefully, we will encourage and challenge one another along the way with our reflections, questions and critiques.

Because I have assigned myself as the trail guide, so to speak, and you are standing at the head of the trail, I think it is important that I share with you a little bit about the map I am using. I offer one way of reading the Bible; clearly there are as many ways to read the Bible as there are readers of the Bible, but I can only be truly responsible for my own way. If you are a member or visitor at The First Presbyterian Church, this will not be unfamiliar to you.

My own, personal beliefs about Scripture

(let this be a disclaimer! I’m not speaking for anyone but myself)-

The Bible is a book, written over a long period of time by multiple authors, edited over a long period of time by multiple editors, compiled over a long period of time by multiple compilators (oh, wouldn’t this make a great word?). These authors, editors and compilators (OK, compilers, I know), were of the human variety, men (and women!) who lived lives as complicated as our own, as profane as our own, and as sacred as our own. They made mistakes (there are typos in the Bible!); they had agendas; they lived in a context very different from ours. The Bible reflects power struggles, unchecked misogyny, and competing theologies. The Bible is redundant and contradictory- we will see this almost immediately when we confront the two versions of Creation and the two versions of the Flood, which biblical editors chose to weave together rather than choose between them.

The Bible is not a literal history book, though there is much history to be learned from it. The stated authors are not often the actual authors. Moses did not write the first five books of the Old Testament. King David did not pen all of the Psalms attributed to him. Paul only wrote a handful of the letters that carry his name. And the Gospels are complicated (let’s save that for later in the year). Stories that read like newspaper articles- with the ‘who/what/when/where/why/how’ answered with great thoroughness may be completely fabricated. Just because it reads like history, doesn’t mean it is.

Well, at this point, maybe some of you have written me off as a blasphemer and heretic. But if you haven’t, there is grace to be found in even the most critical of historical/critical approaches to reading Scripture. Those whose hands, minds and hearts touched the Bible as it was being created shared a commonality- a desire to know God, a desire to unravel the mystery of the divine, and a desire to be seen in God’s favor. That, in and of itself, is enough to make this text holy. For where we search for God, God is found. In the process of our inquiry, God is uncovered. As one theologian has described the Bible- it is a window through which we can glimpse the divine, and it is a mirror in which we catch a glimpse of ourselves.

So let’s get to it. Genesis awaits…

Posted in Bible Study, Theology | 6 Comments