refreshment

While Deuteronomy is not specifically liturgical, the flow of the text is so poetic and ‘hymnal’ that many of the verses/phrasings have been plugged into Jewish and Christian liturgy as foundational prayers and catechism. For instance, one of the most important prayers in Judaism is the She’ma- Deuteronomy 6:4: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.” It is the quintessential affirmation of faith, followed by this beautiful and familiar phrase, “And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your being and with all your might.” Perhaps we are more familiar with Jesus’ recitation of Deuteronomy in Matthew 22:34-40; Mark 12:28-34; and Luke 10:25-28 (for a comparison of stories among the synoptic Gospels, I highly recommend Gospel Parallels for your library).

From Mark’s Gospel:

One of the scribes came near and heard them disputing with one another, and seeing that Jesus answered them well, [the scribe] asked [Jesus], “Which commandment is the first of all?” Jesus answered, “The first is, ‘Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ The second is this, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.”

Remember, ‘you shall love your neighbor as yourself’, is quoted directly from Leviticus 19:18.

For those of you who have had the privilege of attending a Passover Seder this last week, you would have heard the words of Deuteronomy 6:20 echoed in the Haggadah.

Finally, I was surprised to read Deuteronomy 8:3, connecting the familiar phrase with its origin, “God humbled you by letting you hunger, then by feeding you with manna, with which neither you nor your ancestors were acquainted, in order to make you understand that one does not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of the Lord.”

Blessed and happy reading!

Posted in Bible Study, Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah, Theology | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

the beginning of mercy

Plugging away at Deuteronomy and stopped short at 4:31- For the Lord your God is a merciful god. He will not let you go and will not destroy you and will not forget your fathers’ covenant that He swore to them.

It felt a little like a blast of fresh, cold air on an oppressively hot day. After the lifelessness of cultic protocol and geneaology, and the bloodiness of battle and divine punishment, the word ‘merciful’ jumped out of the text. Thank you, Deuteronomist, for introducing a rhetorical pattern that is pleasantly familiar, achingly desired, long sought after. “For the Lord your God is a merciful God.”

Posted in Bible Study, Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah | Tagged | Leave a comment

a stumbling block

Numbers has been a stumbling block for me, and I wonder if you have had a similar experience? Yes, I cringed and yawned plenty through certain parts of Genesis, Exodus and Leviticus, but nothing has felt quite so alien (and grace-less) as the Book of Numbers. Like the other Priestly texts, Numbers has a distinctive outlook, and that’s why we see the lists- names and offerings and obscure laws- that identify a clearly defined world as seen through the eyes of this particular group.

And if you tried to read Numbers without a commentary, I can’t even begin to imagine how confused and frustrated you must be feeling. There is a lack of narrative continuity; there are multiple redundancies; and there are bits of ancient tradition spliced into the narrative with no clear logic. From an anthropological standpoint, Numbers might be seen as a curious oddity, worth a second glance. As faithful Christians on a journey, Numbers just doesn’t have a lot to offer.

In the grand arc of the Pentateuch, Numbers describes the Israelites in the Wilderness, on the cusp of their entry into Canaan. The wilderness generation has proven unfaithful time and again, and they will not reach the Promised Land themselves, but for the faithful Caleb and Joshua. Aaron dies on a mountainside; Moses sins against God (by taking credit for a water miracle) and is told that he, too, will not reach the Promised Land. Countless thousands are ‘destroyed’ for their infidelities. And in a disturbing story toward the end of the book (chapter 31),  Moses sends the Israelites troops back into the territory of the Midianites to kill off the women and children. As Robert Alter describes, this is “an instance in which the biblical outlook sadly failed to transcend its historical contexts.” I think it’s worth holding on to that quote as we move forward in our reading. Rather than engage in unconvincing apologetics, we might be more faithful to hold the tension of narratives that simply fail to transcend historical context. That is to say, there are some texts that we may have to conclude are irredeemable.

The only truly memorable story in the Book of Numbers is the narrative of Balaam’s Ass. It’s a strange story, utterly dissimilar to the whole biblical narrative. Other than the serpent in Genesis, this is the only instance of a talking animal. And it is meant as satire- the powerful, polytheistic soothsayer, Balaam, becomes Yahweh’s instrument, blessing the Israelites instead of cursing them (as he was hired by Balak to do).

So this is your Book of Numbers shortcut, people! Read the story of Balaam, beginning with his talking ass in Chapter 22.

Posted in Bible Study, Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah | Tagged , | 2 Comments

i did it! (and you can, too, i promise)

Please forgive me if I take a moment of personal privilege to publicly pat myself on the back for – finishing Leviticus! I have spent the past three hours on a lumpy couch in my local coffee shop, plodding through the text, verse by verse. Yes, it was tedious. Yes, it was discomforting and disturbing. Yes, it was enlightening. Yes, it was exhilarating! But, please, please, please, do not quiz me on what I just read. While I have a drastically improved sense of the book, I could not tell you, with any confidence, the difference between an offense offering, a communion offering, or a votive offering.

If you have three hours to devote to coffee-shop couch-sitting, I highly recommend it. If you do NOT have three hours, let me offer you a shortcut. I offer this shortcut because I do not want you to be deterred from this project. Or, if you are stopping by this blog for the first time, I do not want to hit you with any guilt about what you ‘must’ read in Scripture to be considered a well-informed, faithful Christian. I just don’t think it works that way.

Here it is:
Read Chapters 19 and 26. Chapter 19 is devoted to issues of social justice, and much of its content will sound familiar to you. It is interspersed, be warned, with some difficult text. Overall, it will give you a sense of the ethical imperatives of the Israelite community.
Though Leviticus has 27 chapters, chapter 26 makes more sense as a conclusion to the book (many interpreters consider chapter 27 to be an appendix). Chapter 26 addresses the blessing and curse of God’s covenant with the people Israel. If God’s people do as God commands, life will overflow with blessings. But if the Israelites should forego the covenant, life will be miserable. However, even in the midst of the atrocities rained upon an unfaithful people, there is God’s promise to restore them if they turn back to God. This theme of covenant broken and restored will resurface as our reading continues.

Remember that Leviticus was constructed, in some ways, as a cultic manual for the priesthood. And for the priestly circle, boundaries were of the utmost importance. So it is that we have so many lists and prohibitions, separating clean from unclean, and pure from impure. Creation itself was seen as the process of making order out of chaos. Without rules and restriction, prescriptions and proscriptions, the covenantal community might too easily resemble the communities which had NOT received a covenant with God; might even be assimilated with other communities and lose their identity. And here is another central theme of the Old Testament- the Israelite people are decidedly NOT like other people. And the differences were highlighted, codified and enforced. We modern people get ourselves into lots and lots of trouble if we read Leviticus without a commitment to understanding this important context.

Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 are the verses most commonly cited from the Old Testament of “proof” that God, or The Bible, condemns homosexuality. That is a presumptuous and inaccurate conclusion. For those who would like to read more about this particularly difficult issue, I will refer you to some well-regarded resources that can be found here.

 

Posted in Bible Study, Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah, Theology | Tagged | Leave a comment

Oh, Leviticus, what am I going to do with you?

Kudos to anyone who has ever sat down with the Book of Leviticus, intent on reading the entire thing, start to finish. Whoah! But first, an admission of my frailty- I have only just begun. I’m speeding up quickly and expect to be back on track with the ‘Bible in a Year’ group within a week, but the build up to Ash Wednesday, and the nuttiness that is January/February at the church, simply overcame me.

That said, I am pleasantly surprised by my own experience of this particular discipline- reading the Bible from front to back. I feel like I’ve had my nose up to the canvas of an important painting and now have now stepped far enough away to be able to contemplate the entire picture, not simply the brush strokes and detail work of a tiny square of the painting.

As I’ve said in earlier posts, it may seem the obvious way to read the Bible, but it’s not like starting a novel on page 1 and moving onwards. The Bible, as Peter Gomes puts it, is not a book so much as it is a library of books. There is some narrative continuity, of course, but then there are the roadblocks, the concentration killers like Leviticus, that make us question this entire endeavor. What the heck is Leviticus talking about? Why is it important to us? And why is it smack in the middle of the Pentateuch, the beating heart of Hebrew Scripture? (And perhaps, most importantly- can’t we just skip it?)

Well, let me try to answer these questions with as much expediency as possible (because you and I both need to get our heads back in the Bible). You would be correct to call the Book of Leviticus a priestly instruction manual. It was written by and for the priestly cult practicing early Judaism in Babylonia, after the destruction of the Temple and great exile from Jerusalem in the middle of the sixth century BCE. Their world had been destroyed, uprooted, transplanted. The Temple, the place of God’s dwelling, the central location of their religion, had been smashed to bits. Judaism, at the time, was still centrally focused on animal sacrifice- burnt offerings to God for just about every human condition and every human season.

Now in Babylonia, the priestly cult set about infusing the slowly evolving book that has become Hebrew Scripture (or the Old Testament, though these are not exactly interchangeable terms) with their cosmic view. It’s already happening in Genesis (the orderly Creation narrative) and Exodus (the detailed instructions for the building of the Tabernacle), and now it’s in full force. In the middle of the Pentateuch, we have a manual of cultic instruction that lifts up the Priestly concerns about order, division, and purity.

We’re not going to turn to Leviticus in moments of despair, looking for a message of hope. We’re not going to read it much in worship, either. It will take a back seat to other biblical books. But it is important. For one thing, certain verses have been used by particular communities as ‘proof’ of how God thinks about certain things (I will address this in a separate post). So, it is in our best interest to understand broadly what is going on in this book, even if we will never understand much of the minutiae. Even if Leviticus does not come into our normal rotation of favorite passages, it’s worth reading all the way through, at least once.

Here is my favorite paragraph about Leviticus from Robert Alter:

There is very little scholarship that “really mitigates the sense of strangeness that people of our own era are likely to feel in reading Leviticus. The preoccupation with dermatological conditions, genital discharges, mildew, the recipes for fritters and breads used in the cult, and the dissection of animals and the distinctions among their various inner organs does not correspond to modern assumptions about the content of great sacred literature.

“Nevertheless, all these regulations are reflections of a pervasive spiritual seriousness grounded in a comprehensive, coherent conception of reality… Holiness could be achieved, and had to be protected, only by a constant confirmation of hierarchical distinction, by laying out reality in distinct realms and categories separated by barricades of prohibitions.”

Posted in Bible Study, Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah, Theology | Tagged | 1 Comment

remember that you are dust…

In our solemn celebration of Ash Wednesday, we are invited to remember our beginnings and our endings. God breathed the breath of life into the dust of the earth, and we, who once were not, BECAME. At a time beyond our knowing, we will return to dust, joining all-things-once-living in the great compost heap that is this beautiful earth. It is a reality that we carry with us in every moment- some of us more exquisitely aware of our mortality than others. Today, we carry our awareness as a badge of our identity, smudged on our forehead for everyone to see. We are dust, the smudges say. We are frail, and we are mortal, the smudges imply. And we are placing our own dustiness in the hands of the one who made us, confident that the ONE who was there before we BECAME will continue to be there when we no longer ARE.

In reponse to God’s faithfulness as our Author and Comforter, we admit our frailties, our faults, our sins. We seek repentance and find, in doing so, that the smudges on our forehead have cleansing properties- wiping away what has separated us from God and clarifying our own purposes in a wider schema.

Posted in Liturgy, Theology | Tagged | Leave a comment

into the waters

The imagery of water in the Old Testament strikes me this week, as we prepare to celebrate the sacrament of Baptism in worship on Sunday. The sacrament of Baptism finds its origin in the Gospel narratives of Matthew 3:13-17, Mark 1:9-11, and Luke 3:21-22 and is uniquely Christian. As theologian Karl Barth put it, “Baptism is the first step of the way of a Christian life which is shaped looking to Jesus Christ.” But the imagery and symbolism of baptism is more ancient, encompassing (but not superseding) the stories and theology of the Old Testament. For John Calvin, Protestant reformer and ‘father’ of our Presbyterian tradition, baptism hearkens all the way back to the covenant God made with Abraham, initiating a relationship between God and humanity. Water, the most basic element of our existence, is the means by which we are baptized, that is, made members of the community of faith, ordained to our discipleship, and cleansed of all that would separate us from God. In prayer, we reach back in our tradition, lifting out the imagery of water as a symbol of new life, refreshment and the cleansing power of God’s covenantal grace. And so, on Sunday, we will hear this prayer:

We give you thanks, Eternal God, for you nourish and sustain all living things by the gift of water.  In the beginning of time, your Spirit moved over the watery chaos, calling forth order and life.

In the time of Noah, you destroyed evil by the waters of the flood, giving righteousness a new beginning.

You led Israel out of slavery, through the waters of the sea, into the freedom of the promised land.

In the waters of Jordan Jesus was baptized by John and anointed with your Spirit.  By the baptism of his own death and resurrection,Christ set us free from sin and death, and opened the way to eternal life.

We thank you, O God, for the water of baptism.  In it we are buried with Christ in his death.  From it we are raised to share in his resurrection, through it we are reborn by the power of the Holy Spirit.

Pour out your Spirit upon us and upon this water, that this font may be your womb of new birth. May all who now pass through these waters be delivered from death to life, from bondage to freedom, from sin to righteousness.  Bind them to the household of faith, guard them from all evil.  Strengthen them to serve you with joy until the day you make all things new. To you be all praise, honor, and glory; through Jesus Christ our Savior, who, with you and the Holy Spirit, lives and reigns forever.  Amen.

Posted in Liturgy, Theology | 3 Comments

a flawed hero

I found this sermon from August 31, 2008. It was an experiment for me- it’s not a first person narrative, but it has the feel of first-person. The process of crafting this sermon was wonderful- spiritually and theologically, and it has given me an entirely new way to approach the character of Moses. Let me know what you think.

Posted in Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah, Sermons, Theology | Leave a comment

transitions

The more time I spend with Robert Alter’s The Five Books of Moses, the more I fall in love with the clarity of his translation and the poetry of his commentary. It’s a big book, meant for your ‘reference library’ and not for subway reading, but it is well worth the heft.

To that end, I want Alter to respond to Anna’s interesting observation about the shifting descriptions of God (and God’s relation to humans) from Genesis to Exodus.

Here is what Alter has to say:

“There is a certain correlation between the distancing of the central character [Moses] and the distancing of the figure of God in Exodus… God in Genesis, as one detects in a glimpse of Him in the Garden story and as one can see quite clearly in His encounter with Abraham in Genesis 18, walks about the earth looking very much like a man- indeed, being easily mistaken for a man until He chooses to reveal His identity- and at some points engaging a human being in what is clearly represented as face-to-face conversation. God in Exodus has become essentially unseeable, overpowering, and awesomely refulgent. Barriers to access accompany Him everywhere, just as they will be instituted architecturally in the tripartite structure of the sanctuary that He orders the Israelites to build.

“The first manifestation of God’s presence to Moses is in the anomaly of the fire burning in a bush without consuming it, and then the divine voice enjoins Moses, “Come no closer here,” and proceeds to speak to him without being in any way visible to him. Fire, which betokens potent energy and which is something one cannot touch without being hurt or destroyed, is the protective perimeter out of which God addresses Moses and the Israelites throughout the story: all of Mount Sinai will be smoking like a firebrand, with celestial fireworks of lightning and thunder crackling round its peak, when God reveals the Ten Commandments to Moses…

“God in Exodus has become more of an ungraspable mystery than He seems in Genesis; and as He moves here from the sphere of the clan that is the context of the Patriarchal Tales to the arena of history, His sheer power as supreme deity and His implacability against those who would thwart His purposes emerge as the most salient aspects of the divine character.”

Welcome to Exodus! (I say this, knowing that most of you are twenty chapters in already; I’m catching up!)

Posted in Bible Study, Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah, Theology | Leave a comment

foreskin’s lament and a recipe for bread

Some responses, from my new best friend, Robert Alter:

Bradley, Of Exodus 4:24-26, Robert Alter says this:
“This elliptic story is the most enigmatic episode in all of Exodus. It seems unlikely that we will ever resolve the enigmas it poses.” He then goes on to present a number of potential ‘readings,’ which are themselves enigmatic.
The story (and the deity represented) might even be from a premonotheistic stratum of Hebrew culture. Alter continues, “What seems more plausible is that Zipporah’s act reflects an older raionale for circumcision among the West Semitic peoples than the covenantal one enunciated in Genesis 17. Here circumcision serves as an apotropaic device, to ward off the hostility of a dangerous deity by offering him a bloody scrap of the son’s flesh, a kind of symbolic synecdoche of human sacrifice. The circumciser, moreover, is the mother, and not the father, as enjoined in Genesis.”
Fascinating!

And Anna, for you:
In Exodus 12:8, Alter translates the word as ‘flatbread’: “The etymology of the Hebrew matsot remains uncertain. In Genesis 19, Lot serves matsot to the two anonymous guests who were to his house at nightfall, and the implication is that this is a kind of bread that can be baked hastily, with no need to wait for the dough to rise before putting it in the oven.”
In Exodus 12:15 & 17: “Here the term matsot is the name of the festival, which is also called pesach. Some have plausibly conjectured that there were originally two different holidays- matsot agricultural and pesach pastoral- that were drawn together in the literary formulation of this text and hence in Israelite practice.”

Is this helpful?

Posted in Bible Study, Five Books of Moses; Pentateuch; Torah, Theology | Leave a comment